Publisher and editorial policy
ai-undresser.info publishes one thing: an evidence review of AI undresser and nudify app risks, the law that now applies to them, and the routes available to people targeted by non-consensual intimate imagery. This page states who operates the site, how its claims are sourced, and what it deliberately does not do.
Who publishes this site
The site is operated by a company registered in Northern Ireland. The details below can be checked independently against the public register — the link goes to the Companies House record itself, not to a copy of it.
- Registered name
- ROSMAN AND ROSMAN LIMITED
- Company number
NI694139- Company type
- Private limited company
- Status
- Active
- Incorporated
- Registered office
- 71 Cregagh Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT6 8PY
- Public register
- Companies House record for NI694139
- Contact
- [add published contact address before launch]
An honest statement of standing. The publisher is a registered trading company, not a research institute, a law firm or a child-protection charity, and this site claims no in-house expertise in any of those fields. Nothing here is presented as original research or as professional advice. The value of the report lies in collecting, attributing and plainly explaining the findings of organisations that do hold that expertise — each of them named and linked at the point their finding is used.
Editorial and sourcing policy
These rules govern every factual claim on this site. They exist because the subject is one where a wrong number or an invented credential does measurable damage to people who are already being harmed.
- Primary sources only, attributed in placeEvery statistic and legal statement traces to a named original — a research publication, a statute, or a regulator. Secondary reporting is not used as a source, and no figure is carried over from another article's summary of a study.
- Nothing is estimated or rounded for effectFigures appear as the source states them. Where a number comes from a single study, it is attributed as that study's finding rather than presented as settled fact.
- No invented people, credentials or experienceThe site carries no fabricated author personas, no stock-photo "team", and no claims of professional qualification. Where a named human author with relevant standing is required, that requirement is met or the claim is not made.
- No product names, rankings, reviews or linksThe report describes the category of tools and never individual services. It publishes no directory, no comparison, no "alternatives" list and no outbound link to any such tool, because a list of products functions as a storefront whatever warnings surround it.
- No instructions for misuseNothing here explains how to obtain, operate or circumvent the restrictions on these tools, and no example imagery appears anywhere on the site.
- Limitations stated, not hiddenWhere the evidence is a snapshot, incomplete, or restricted to particular jurisdictions, the report says so in the text rather than in a footnote.
What this site does not cover
The report addresses the legal position in the United Kingdom and the United States, because those are the jurisdictions where primary legislative sources were available and verifiable at the time of review. It does not state the law anywhere else, and readers elsewhere should treat it as orientation rather than as a description of their own rights.
It is not legal, psychological or medical advice, and no part of it substitutes for a qualified professional in the reader's own jurisdiction. It does not evaluate, compare or recommend any service. It does not provide takedown services, and has no relationship with any of the organisations it cites — the links are references, not partnerships.
Where a person under 18 may be depicted, the site gives one instruction and no others: contact the police and a dedicated child protection hotline. That is deliberate. Every other route described in the report is unavailable in that situation, and offering alternatives would be actively harmful.
Corrections
Factual corrections are welcome and are acted on rather than argued with. If a figure, a legal statement or an attribution on this site is wrong or has been overtaken by events, write to the publisher at the contact address above with the source that establishes the correct position.
The report carries a visible review date. Material changes to the underlying law or research are reflected in the text and the date is updated at the same time; the date is not refreshed for cosmetic edits, because a review date that moves without a review means nothing.